Where do I begin?
As usual, spoilers ahead.
Where do I begin?
As usual, spoilers ahead.
I haven’t been really watching movies beyond Marvel properties lately, but with some time that I decided not to spend on actual work, I decided to clear a little of my movie backlog.
Snowpiercer proved a good decision.
If there’s a movie that encapsulates the idea of a fitting end, this is it.
What a film. What a finale. What a farewell.
Damn it, the tears are coming again.
Still the only horror film I’ll ever recommend to anyone. Maybe Jurassic Park too, just for that velociraptor scene. Although those velociraptors are scientifically inaccurate…
I must really be awful to watch movies with.
Everything I hated about that film, condensed into a full 16 minutes of video. Peter Jackson, what ever happened to winning Oscars by the buttload with the original LotR?
What happened to Disney?
Wreck-It Ralph was awesome. Frozen is a massive hit, and now this. Big Hero 6.
There’s so much to gush about. The gorgeous animation, the fun action, the emotional moments, the well-timed comedy, the simple yet effective plot…the only thing I’m a smidgen annoyed about is it makes me feel awful for even wanting to criticise a film so beautifully crafted and so well written.
I have to admit tearing up at Tadashi’s death, because the writers decided to build his character beforehand. And rightly so, because so many films fail to realise that if you want the audience to connect to the protagonist, you have to let them experience what the protagonist experiences. It also helps that Tadashi was written as the sort of friendly, brotherly character that’s so easy to connect to, and doesn’t require much time to develop, saving the precious minutes for Baymax.
I have to say, the only thing that sort of lets the show down is the characters. Most of them aren’t really that well developed, but we can’t all have multiple movies for each character to build to a massive team film. There was enough for Hiro though, and while he does undergo a cliché emotional development (grief, anger, acceptance, HERO!), it’s a friendly formula that works well for a children’s movie like this.
The rest of the team are pretty standard types, and GoGo isn’t much of a nerd as nerds go. But the film did its best to make every character fun and entertaining in their own ways (with some really unique ‘powers’), and that’s about as much as I can ask for.
The true main character is Baymax though. The writers deliberately made him less robot and more person, including that hilarious scene where he was low on battery and behaved like a stereotypical drunk. The robot is just too darn adorable with his constant bad timing, and that final scene where Baymax sends Hiro to safety? I know it’s a robot, and obviously Hiro got to rebuild him at the end, but damn if the tears weren’t welling up.
That does bring me to the plot. Other than the complaints that the final bit where Hiro needs to save Abigail was too long (I mean, the portal’s destabilising, and you have time to hug Baymax?!), everything else was great. It was targeted at children, who will love the simple, exciting, yet extremely heart-warming plot. Even the most critical of watchers have to admit that the film made the basic formula work.
I criticise formulaic films all the time, but only because they bore me to death with predictable events. Sure, Big Hero 6 was predictable. But it was also fun. It was sweet and adorable. It was touching. Most importantly, it connected with the audience. When you end a film with a profound sense of emptiness, you know that film was epic.
Of course, no Marvel-based film is complete without a Stan Lee cameo, this time in the post-credits. But I didn’t care for the Stan Lee cameo, because it has lost its charm over so many Marvel films, and the movie itself was far, far more interesting.
Sequel? Nah, because a sequel at this point will really just be trying to earn money off Baymax toys. It’ll be much harder to replicate the same sort of emotional connections the first film made, and it would have shed a lot of its charm.
But I’ll watch one anyway. And I need to get me a Baymax toy…
Woah. A gritty Power Rangers eh? Not the easiest short film to catch, but packs quite a punch. I’ll be nitpicking if I commented negatively on the digital squibs and choreography. It’s as good as what Hollywood often produces, so shame on them. Nice work!
What. A. Blast.
I went into the film with a pretty good idea of what it was going to be: Keanu Reeves kicking ass. And it lived up to its billing, and then some.
It’s been far too long since Keanu has done something that amazed me, but this is it. John Wick is a brilliantly paced film with great action, great choreography and is a perfect vehicle for Keanu Reeves. He really channelled the character, and given his own life experiences, it seems almost perfect for the man (much like how Birdman is a reflection of Michael Keaton). He does a brilliant job of portraying the deep anger and pain of John Wick, and frankly, it was quite intense.
But the main point of the film was the action, and boy was it good. There was no ridiculous shaky cam to cover up poor choreography, just a lot of great shots of well-choreographed fights. The fights were gritty, brutal, and felt so real; The Expendables could learn a lot from just the physical combat.
And then the guns. Oh my goodness. HOLLYWOOD HAS LEARNT THAT GUNS RUN OUT OF AMMO. It thrilled me to see Keanu reload his pistol, and even if there was an ungodly amount of muzzle flash, impossibly silent suppressors, cars acting as bullet shields, obvious digital squibs and explosions that were too fiery to be real, just to see a gun needing a reload was brilliant. The way the film integrated the reloading into the fight so seamlessly only made it that much better.
Also, props to the scriptwriters for keeping the dialogue simple and the backstory clean. I wouldn’t say they were extremely fantastic lines, but they didn’t detract from the action, and allowed the characters to breathe and live beyond the simple concept of assassins or crime lords. It was a far more subtle attempt at character development than plenty of action films these days, and it succeeded in giving characters that bit of life that allows the audience to connect to them.
I loved the fact that the film also didn’t treat us all as idiots by keeping things suggestive, to encourage the audience to think a little and thus connect to the film. None of the characters tried to deliver awkward exposition, and they looked so natural in their world as a result. I love that kind of storytelling, which is a form I try to mimic.
What can I say? Stallone, eat your heart out. This is what The Expendables should have been. This isn’t Bourne, but it doesn’t have to be. I usually don’t advocate for sequels, but I’ll watch the hell out of a John Wick 2.
I think I must’ve watched Gladiator half a dozen times. It’s a really good film, and probably the main reason why I even gave Robin Hood a shot. Turns out the Russell Crowe/Ridley Scott thing doesn’t always work out…
From what I gather, Hollywood and the entire film industry is still very much sexist, with very defined gender roles and plenty of films failing the Bechdel Test. I didn’t find the video uncomfortable; just highly amused to see the gender swap. But I doubt that sort of thing will ever happen in real films. It won’t sell, and it’ll be too controversial I guess.
Oh well. Film was never the quickest to pick up social changes anyway.